Heading: (Telephone)
Author:
Title: A Typed Letter Signed from the Independent Telephone Association and their Constitution booklet in wrappers
Place Published:
Publisher:
Date Published: 1898
Description:

H.D. Critchfield. Printed Letter Signed for the Independent Telephone Association of the United States of America. Mt. Vernon, Ohio, Jan. 1, 1898. 3pp. Sending a membership application to J.W.Richard, Wadsworth, Ohio.

Lot includes a printed Constitution of the Independent Telephone Association of the United States of America, Adopted at Detroit, June 23, 1897 Columbus, Ohio, undated, ca. 1898. 12 pp. 3½x6", original blue wrappers. With original mailing envelope. 

Critchfield writes in the typed letter: “…the American Bell Telephone Company has brought two suits on the Berliner patent and has been and is threatening to bring many others against owners and operators of Independent exchanges… Bell Telephone …is a thoroughly organized and powerful corporation…they have been preparing for this day (the time when their right to a monopoly of the telephone business would be questioned) ever since their organization in the 70s…[so that] when opposition sprang up they would be in the best condition to combat and crush it out of existence …The Independent Telephone Association of the United States…has retained…able counsel… and practical and theoretical telephone experts…to take up the defense of suits which may be brought against any member of the Association… meeting a powerful enemy with its own weapons…by joining our forces, raising the necessary funds to prepare and fight such cases…the danger…is great and imminent…a systematic and thorough effort has been made by the Bell Company to prolong its existence and if all is not done… to defeat their claims they will continue to enjoy the monopoly of the telephone business in the future as they have in the past…” In 1901, a federal court would declare Emile Berliner’s telephone transmitter patent, acquired by Bell Telephone, to be void, giving smaller independent phone companies the opportunity by 1905 to acquire more subscribers than Bell nationally. Nevertheless, Bell and its successor, AT&T, would continue to retain the image of a powerful monopoly.

Light wear; very good.